Why Public Markets are a Device for Transferring Money from the Impatient to the Patient.

By: Juan Carlos Herrera & Cole Conkling

Liquidity is defined as the ease at which an asset can be readily converted to cash. It’s one of the main benefits of investing in the publicly traded markets of stocks, bonds, and commodities. That you can readily sell such assets by the push of a button on your phone is an unbelievable accomplishment. This benefit, however, comes at a steep cost: having to see the market price of the assets every day. Us emotional humans are typically ill-equipped to handle these price swings, which can really be a problem for our long-term financial health.    

Imagine you purchased a farm perfectly suited for growing corn and wheat on land you felt certain would steadily appreciate over time. Some years the crop yields are great, some years not so much. Or say you bought an investment property in a nice part of town. Some years the property would be leased out at high rates, other years maybe not. But again, you felt confident that, over time, the price of the property would appreciate. In both examples, you receive cash flows every year and have no plans of selling because you believe in the long-term prospects of your investment. You’re, therefore, not particularly worried about the short-term news of the day, nor are you concerned with what you could get if you sold your investment today—because, again, you’re not selling for many years. Over time, both the farm and the rental property appreciate substantially in value, and when you sell many years later you receive a substantial profit, all while earning cash flows each year. Here, you were a patient investor and it paid off 

Now imagine you invested in shares of every publicly traded company in the world—over 9,000—companies like Apple, Google, Tesla, Toyota, Sony, Nestle, JP Morgan, and Tencent. Imagine you also invested in all the bonds (more than 19,000 bonds, issued by governments and companies), commodities (e.g., oil, gold, wheat, silver, etc.) in the world. Over time, the stocks, bonds, and commodities also appreciate substantially in value. This time, however, you don’t hold to sell many years later, but rather exit and enter these investments multiple times depending on whatever the market price is on your phone. Sometimes you buy or sell at the right moment, but mostly you don’t. Even though the investment ended up appreciating even greater than the private investment examples above, you don’t receive all the profits due to your poor market timing. In the end, you realize you would have been better of just holding on through thick and thin like you did with the private investment examples above. Here you were an impatient investor, and it hurt you. 

So, why the difference? Why do we tend to be patient investors with private investments and impatient investors with public investments? Afterall, the risks are much higher in the private investment examples as there is less liquidity, less transparency, and much less diversification. Access to liquidity means there is someone offering to buy your investment, allowing you to always know the true value of it. However, that also means that the price will move constantly depending on new information being received by your potential buyers. This creates temptations for many investors to buy and sell quickly in hopes of quick profits, or to avoid temporary losses. It also creates heavy emotional swings each time an investor checks the value of their investments. The price of a private investment, on the other hand, is unknown because there’s no active market of buyers constantly “knocking on your door each day” making an offer to buy your farm or rental property. 

With the private market examples, investors tend to focus more on the cash flows they receive from the farm’s crops or the leased property and pay little to no attention to the actual value of the asset itself. This is one of the main reasons investors believe that their private investments are less volatile and “safer” than public investments. But this is simply an illusion since the actual value of private investments are largely unknown. The true value of a private investment is only known when an bona fide offer to buy is received and, in most cases, this does not happen until the owner tries to sell it. Let’s break this down further.

If you want to sell your house right now, the actual cash value to you is zero. Yes, zero! That’s because you presumably don’t have a current offer to buy it and, therefore, it cannot be converted into cash today. Your house is, thus, an illiquid asset. Even with a ready cash buyer, it will take some time for the transaction to close and for you to receive your money in hand. But you might say that you have an appraisal of its value, or an idea of what you could sell it for based on comparable houses in the market. Appraisals and rough valuations, however, are not the same as bona fide offers to buy; nor are they the same as a closed transaction with cash in hand. What if the market changes from when the appraisal was done? What if a latent defect is discovered during the inspection process that drastically lowers the value of your home? What if interest rates shoot up, making your buyer pool smaller and less able to finance the purchase at your offered price? You might think your home is worth a certain amount, but if you’re in urgent need of the money today and nobody is there to make an offer and close today, then the price is zero until the deal is done. Business owners often make this mistake too by comparing the value of their investment portfolios with the paper valuations of their private, illiquid company or other private investments. That’s why there is a premium on liquid assets like public stocks, bonds, and commodities: They can be readily converted to cash today. Their true market value is known right this very moment. 

The laws of risk and return apply to all investments, not just liquid, public investments. And the correlations between asset classes in the private and public markets are very high. If the economy is strong, both public and private assets will do well; if the economy is weak, both will suffer. You may not realize how much your private investments are suffering, because you cannot readily see the market price, but you’ll find out if you try to sell. Investors need to approach investing in public markets the same way they do private markets and view the liquidity in public markets as a benefit instead of letting the price swings sway them emotionally. Investors are better off ignoring all the news and noise regarding the public markets just like they do when evaluating how their private investments are doing. 

Know what you’re buying!

Public markets can seem overly complicated, with numbers constantly whizzing by on T.V. screens all day and prices seemingly moving with all the grace of roller coaster. A lot of people get overwhelmed and go to private markets or deals that they can “touch and see,” “know,” or “understand.” This, however, may result in earning less on a private investment than they could have on a similar public investment. Or taking more risk for the same return they could have gotten in the public markets. Others might hire a professional adviser to help them with their public investments, without really understanding what’s going on—“I’ll let him deal with it” they might say. This blind, ignorant trust usually dissolves when markets crash, ending with phone calls to the adviser to “get out and get out now.” Indeed, one of the main reasons investors sell during temporary drawdowns is that they don’t understand the investment and fear it will never come back. This is understandable. 

Let’s go back to the private investment examples again.  Imagine you’re not ready to sell, but that someone offered to buy your investment for 15% less than what you thought it was worth. Would you sell it to them? If you don’t need the money and remain confident that the farm or rental property will appreciate over time, then probably not. The difference here is that the investor feels comfortable in understanding what a farm or property is and that it will appreciate over time. Maybe you think to yourself: That buyer is wrong, he doesn’t know what he’s talking about, he doesn’t understand this market or my investment, what a lunatic!  

Public markets should be viewed the same. Most people get into trouble because they don’t really know what’s in their public investment portfolios and view price swings like a casino that randomly fluctuates. But just because you can buy and sell at any time doesn’t mean you should. As an investor, you must understand (and believe in) the assets you’re holding, while keeping in mind that the daily gyrations in price are akin to the hypothetical buyer offering to buy your farm or rental property for 15% less than what you paid for it. In both examples, you have the choice to ignore the offers or not.

What about fixed income investments that don’t have much volatility, like bank savings accounts or certificates of deposits? 

Let’s assume you make an investment in a one-year T-Bill at the end of 2018 that paid you 2.63%. You know that after one year you’re guaranteed by the U.S. government to receive a 2.63% return. Let’s also assume that you have an investment in a passive diversified portfolio of global stocks and the value of that portfolio is temporarily down 10% from the moment you invested. Are you better off in the one-year T-Bill guaranteed to pay you 2.63%? Maybe, but that depends on what your investment goal is and how risk tolerant you are.

Now let’s see what happened 12 months later:

 

The low-risk T-Bill investment still looks better over this period, but now you must decide what to do with the money, since the 1-Year T-Bill paying 2.63% has matured. Do you buy another T-Bill or invest it in the stock market? Again, this decision depends on your goals, time horizon, and risk tolerance. Let’s assume you repeat the investment but now must settle for a lower yield of 1.73% for the next 12 months on the T-Bill. Your investment in the stock market remains since you never sold out of that. Let’s fast forward another 12 months: 

Wow! A lot has happened. Covid-19 hit, and the world changed on a dime. But after these last 12 months, with all the ups and downs, your stock market investment is up 12% and you now must decide what to do again with the money that has returned to your checking account from your T-Bill investment. However, now the interest rate for the next 12 months is low and will only pay you 0.12%. Let’s assume you remain very risk averse with these funds and decide to repeat the investment for another year. You still don’t sell the stock market investment. Let’s fast forward a year: 

Your stock market investment that started down 10% is now up more than 43% and once again your T-Bill money is back in your checking account after another 12-month period. Now let’s say you are not interested in the low rate of 0.09% and instead of re-investing your T-bill proceeds you decide to invest it all into the stock market investment. Afterall it’s done amazing! Let’s now fast forward to today. 

 

As of March 24, 2022, this is where you stand:

 

Now what do you do? 

The point of this exercise is that if you’re looking to earn more than the risk-free rate of return, you’ll have to tolerate some volatility. How much will again depend on your risk tolerance. Remember there’s no free lunch and trying to time the market in the long run is also not a good idea. If you want high expected returns, you’re going to have to take some risk. But volatility shouldn’t be a problem if you know what you are investing in and are patient like the private investment examples. If your global stock portfolio is down 25%, like in the examples above, remind yourself that you own the largest 9,000 companies in the world and if that doesn’t bounce back then nothing will. You shouldn’t mind the fluctuations of your investments in the short term if you are not planning to sell anytime soon. Remember that volatility is like the random person knocking on your door every day offering you crazy prices for your investments—ignore it! 

Bringing it all together.

Let’s see a few more examples of public and private investments to further illustrate how investors should view them the same. Let’s first look at the price of an average home since the year 2000.

It looks like a smooth curve going up with almost no volatility, right? But that’s because it’s not a liquid asset and the measurement used to calculate this is an average of home price sales throughout the United States, not actual daily prices of bids and asks on home prices. But what would have happened if you had also invested in the S&P 500 during this same time? 

If you can ignore the noise of the daily liquidity the stock market offers, your investment would have grown more than three times. However, while it’s easy to illustrate this in hindsight, it's understandably difficult to live through the ups and downs of daily liquidity in real-time. For this reason, we must view liquidity and daily market prices as an incredible advantage to our investments and not let that advantage affect us psychologically.  

In closing, if you treat your public investments like your private investments, you’ll realize that the daily price movements of public assets are simply the cost for immediate liquidity—they’re a feature, not a bug. If you don’t like the price, then don’t sell, just like you wouldn’t sell your farm or house.

Warren Buffet famously said that “the stock market is a device for transferring money from the impatient to the patient.” Real investing (as opposed to speculating or gambling) takes time above all else, so it pays to be patient.

Inscription Capital, LLC (“Inscription”) is a registered investment adviser. registration as an investment adviser does not imply a certain level of skill or training. Advisory services are only offered to clients or prospective clients where Inscription and its representatives are properly licensed or exempt from licensure.

The information provided is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security. It does not take into account any investor's particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status, or investment horizon. The views expressed in this commentary are subject to change based on market and other conditions.

An index is an unmanaged portfolio of specific securities, the performance of which is often used as a benchmark in judging the relative performance of certain asset classes. Investors cannot invest directly in an index. An index does not charge management fees or brokerage expenses, and no such fees or expenses were deducted from the performance shown.

The information herein was obtained from various sources. Inscription does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information provided by third parties. The information in this report is given as of the date indicated and is believed to be reliable. The firm name assumes no obligation to update this information or to advise on further developments relating to it.

Scientific Method & Investing

Scientific Method & Investing

Science, and more specifically, the scientific method is concerned with making sense of the world around us. For example, physics is concerned with the nature and properties of matter and energy. You drop a ball and it falls to the earth. Why and how does this process happen? While it’s distinguishable from other fields of scientific study, such as biology and chemistry, all scientific fields rely on the scientific method to attempt to understand the physical reality around us. This article will take the reader on a brief exploration of science and the scientific method. We’ll then take a small detour to examine science’s application to modern medicine and how its use there resulted in staggering beneficial health outcomes for humanity. We’ll next look at how science eventually leads to technology, or tools and methods by which we can use scientific information and truths to better our lives and the world. Finally, we’ll look at how the scientific method can be used in investing and how the investment industry should use science and the scientific method to provide better outcomes for all investors.

Short-Term Investing

Short-Term Investing

As an investment advisor, I regularly advise clients to have a long-term outlook
for success. And this is very much true historically. For instance, the S&P 500 has
earned a daily positive return 53% of the time—or a little better than a coin flip. Move
the timeline out four months, however, and the chance of a positive return jumps to
68%. Go out a year and it’s 74%; five years, 87%; ten years, 94%; sixteen plus years,
100%.1 Therefore, it’s very much true that the longer your investment horizon, the more
likely you are to earn a positive return.

Why Investing is Like Dieting

And how you can’t afford to wait to get your investment waistline in shape.

By: Cole Conkling

Investing is like dieting. Yes, dieting. I realized this an appropriate metaphor shortly after joining the investment industry after almost a decade practicing law. During and after the switch, I did what any self-respecting lawyer would do and researched all things investing. I read every authoritative source I could; attended lectures at Rice University twice a week—sitting in the back as the noticeably older guy nobody knew (my partner, Dr. Julio Cacho, was the professor so it wasn’t completely weird); read client letters from some of the giants in the field (seee.g., Buffet, W.; Dalio, R.; Marks, H.); and consumed all manner of blogs, websites, and YouTube videos. I wanted to drink from the fountain of investment knowledge. I bought lots of leather-bound books—I kid, they were mostly paperback. I did this, because, to me prior, the investment world was an enigma. Lots of terms of art I didn’t really know or understand. Complicated . . . a little too complicated. 

My deep dive revealed something surprising (and later disturbing): Most of the investment industry acts in opposition to the objective data because to do otherwise would forgo massive profits. What’s more, even if the paid investment professionals know the evidence—or interestingly, even if their own clients do too—nobody really thinks it applies to them. “This time is different.” “The market is too hot, I’ll wait to buy the dip.” “This stock is massively undervalued.” “This stock is absurdly expensive.” On and on.

I quickly saw that we basically know how to make clients money over sufficient time periods. Thought leaders following the research were all saying the same thing. The evidence (peer-reviewed) has been, and is, clear; it’s not even new—the evidence has been theorized, tested, and published for the world to see for over fifty years now (since at least the early 1950’s). This is not opinion; it’s as close to objective fact as you can get in finance (which, unlike, say physics, is not a “hard” science. Human behavior is involved, after all.). Yet very few were following what I was plainly seeing. And the entire industry, it seemed, was, and is, hell bent on disregarding the evidence.

So, let’s take dieting. If you want to lose weight, it’s relatively simple: Burn more calories than you consume. All else equal, if you follow this formula, you’ll lose weight. Yet, as we all very well know, doing this day in and day out is anything but easy. Life, and more especially our behavior, gets in the way. This behavioral problem is of course well known and regularly exploited by the dieting industry, which is keen to provide all sorts of products and services promising an easy fix. So you get the endless fads. The gurus. The charlatans there to serve you up an easy way out. Do this craze diet. Take this pill. Buy my kale-watermelon-chia seed-detox-shake-system for only twenty-seven easy payments of $19.99! Who needs discipline when you can lose those pounds by that weekend pool party? All charge cards accepted.

We’re our own worst enemy. We know what we should do, but we don’t do it. Consequently, there are a thousand different dieting books, trends, and gimmicks that we just can’t seem to get enough of. Maybe this new chia seed shake system will let me eat those cookies, keep all my horrible habits, and still fit into those jeans I’ve been avoiding. Take my money! Deep down though I think we all know if you burn more calories than you consume you’ll lose weight. The concept is easy. It’s the behavior that’s the problem. And boy do companies love to profit off our bad behavior. 

So it is with investing. We know, based on rigorous academic research what works over the long term. Yet, just like dieting, there are thousands of books, blogs, and “strategies” on investing—most of them offering a new get-rich-quick scheme. But oh would we be so lucky if it was just books being hawked! No, the more disturbing reality is that it’s an entire industry, set up like a sea monster with hundreds of ever-growing, uncontrollable tentacles designed to cash in on our innately poor behavior and biases at the expense of our financial well being. It’s asset managers creating whatever funds they think can be sold to meet a current fad; it’s cable news shows and magazines constantly bombarding viewers with tales of greed, followed by fear; it’s unscrupulous brokers and advisers earning commissions on products they sell you, no matter if they’re appropriate or not; and, yes, it’s all the “experts” making forecasts that never pan out (“My 2020 outlook obviously didn’t account for Covid.”). For the most part, the entire investment industry is designed to get you to do things (i.e., buy and sell), and to do them regularly. Because it’s not about earning you sufficient long-term returns, but rather raking in as much profit as possible.

There’s a better way. It doesn’t happen overnight. Yes, it’s comparatively “boring.” But it works; however, it takes planning, discipline and time—when you start makes a big difference. As we know, the longer you wait to get your physical health in order, the harder it is to right the ship. You get older, slowly put on weight, and before you know it you’re in a deep hole. Same with investing: If you delay too long doing what we know works, the less chance you’ll have of achieving your financial goals. Don’t delay, the clock is ticking.

Inscription Capital, LLC (“Inscription”) is a registered investment adviser. Advisory services are only offered to clients or prospective clients where Inscription and its representatives are properly licensed or exempt from licensure.

The information provided is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security. It does not take into account any investor's particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status or investment horizon. The views expressed in this commentary are subject to change based on market and other conditions.

 

Luck vs. Skill

Luck vs. Skill

Whether we realize it or not, we constantly face situations where we try to sort people into those that are “skilled” and those that are not. Which doctors are the best? Which job applicant is better? Which contractor should we choose? Which athlete should we put on our fantasy team? This sorting problem is particularly relevant for money management, as we attempt to separate skilled managers from merely lucky ones. Despite the ubiquitous nature of identifying skill, it’s an exercise that proves harder than it might seem for fund managers; simply looking at someone’s track record may lead us to an incorrect decision due the influence of randomness (that is, luck).